Alliance For democracy In Iran

Please have a look at my other weblog, Iran Democracy - http://irandemocray.blogspot.com/

IMPERIAL EMBLEM

IMPERIAL EMBLEM
PERSIA

Shahanshah Aryameher

S U N OF P E R S I A

Iranian Freedom Fighters UNITE

Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England. Show all posts

Saturday, November 15, 2008

49 Up

49 Up (5 videos)

The ground-breaking, life-changing documentary by Michael Apted that documented the lives of 7 year old children in 1964 up until age 49! Amazing experience to watch kids become grown-ups and beyond.


Saturday, August 09, 2008

Professor AKS Lambton

Persian scholar who produced classic works on Iran and was invaluable in protecting Britain's interests there.

Professor AKS Lambton, who died on July 19 aged 96, held the Chair of Persian at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London University, from 1953 to 1979; she was a towering figure in her field, unrivalled in the breadth of her knowledge concerning Iran.

She was the author of two classic works – Landlord and Peasant in Persia (1953), about land tenure in Iran, and The Persian Land Reform, 1962-66 (1969) – and her wealth of experience of Iran, which she began to accumulate on her travels there in the mid-1930s, contributed vastly to an understanding of the complex relations within those societies. Her mastery of the history of government in Iran, and in the wider Islamic world, bore fruit in four important works – Theory and Practice in Medieval Persian Government (1980): State and Government in Medieval Islam (1981); Qajar Persia (1987), and Continuity and Change in Medieval Persia (1988) – and she was an editor of The Cambridge History of Islam, volumes 1-11 (1971). Not surprisingly, her expertise, especially her knowledge of the Persian people, was in demand beyond academe, for instance in the aftermath of Iran's nationalisation of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) in 1951, brought about by Iranians' grievances at the risible revenues received by their country. Lambton's insights into the strengths and weaknesses of Iran's then prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, proved a valuable aid to Britain's eventual success, in concert with America, in precipitating an end to Mossadegh's premiership and in ensuring a continued, though reduced, British share in Iran's oil production. AIOC became British Petroleum. Her knowledge of the Persian language – to which her Persian Grammar (1953) and Persian Vocabulary (1964) testify – was put at the disposal of the Foreign Office. As press attaché at the British Embassy in Teheran during the war, she impressed the ambassador with her command of the language; and later she taught Farsi to diplomats and armed services personnel destined for Iran and Afghanistan, insisting on a polished form of the language known as ketabi. She was one of a few foreigners with whom Iranians preferred to converse in Persian, and she would invariably deliver her learned papers to Iranian audiences in their own language. Her steely dignity and her knowledge of their country also helped to earn her a special place, and Iranians who knew her held her in high regard. To some, though, she was something of an irritant. She did not hold a high opinion of the last Shah, and drew his attention to what she saw as the shortcomings of his reforms. Bruised by her criticism, and having banned her from Iran for a time, the Shah did not speak to her when he welcomed the British delegation to Iran in 1971 for the celebrations to mark the 2,500th anniversary of Persian monarchy. When her kinsman Lord Lambton, then parliamentary under-secretary at the Ministry of Defence, visited Iran in the 1970s, the Shah told him: "Your cousin has given me more trouble than any of my own subjects." Taken to its conclusion, Professor Lambton considered that Twelver Shi'ism – entailing belief, widespread in Iran, in 12 divinely ordained leaders, or imams – could lead to violent revolution. This view she reached in the 1960s. After the outbreak of revolution in Iran and Khomeini's assumption of power in 1979 she did not return to the country she knew so well. Ann Katharine Swynford Lambton, known as Nancy to family and friends, was born at Newmarket on February 8 1912, the second child of George Lambton, fifth son of the 2nd Earl of Durham, and his wife Cicely, the elder daughter of Sir John Horner, of Mells Park in Somerset. George Lambton had a brilliant career on the Turf. As an amateur jockey he rode Parasang (a parasang is a Persian unit of length) to victory in the Grand Steeple-Chase de Paris in 1888. As trainer to Lord Derby at the Bedford Lodge stables at Newmarket, he was British flat racing champion trainer in 1906, 1911 and 1912. He trained two Derby winners, and Swynford, for whom Nancy was named, won the St Leger in 1910. Nancy's mother Cicely was one of the last generation of the Horners to live at Mells, which the family had acquired at the dissolution of Glastonbury Abbey. Mostly given to rural pursuits, the Horner family had none the less produced a Coptic scholar, and was strongly inclined to Evangelical piety. This echoed in Nancy Lambton, a country woman as well as a scholar, and later a deaconess in the Church of England. Nancy grew up at the Newmarket stables, and it was as a result of being laid up after a riding accident there that she was introduced to Persian studies by the Orientalist Sir Denison Ross. She had no formal schooling, but in 1930 enrolled as a non-degree student at London University's School of Oriental Studies (later SOAS), of which Ross was the first director. Subsequently, she registered to read for a degree in Persian, which she obtained in 1935. She also studied Arabic under Professor HAR Gibb, who became perhaps her chief academic mentor. In 1934 she won the Ouseley Memorial Scholarship in Persian and, having visited Iran during the long vacation that year, was awarded an Aga Khan travelling scholarship in 1936-37. She completed the research for her doctoral thesis, concerned with Seljuq institutions in pre-Ottoman Turkey, and staying at Esfahan she also worked at the British Hospital, run by Anglican missionaries. She made friends among the Persians, too, and gained sufficient knowledge of the language to publish her first book, Three Persian Dialects, in 1938. She was awarded her PhD in 1939, and later that year was back in Iran again when the Second World War broke out. Thus it was that she came to be appointed press attaché at the British Legation (Embassy from 1943) in Teheran, to which Sir Reader Bullard was appointed as Minister (later Ambassador) in December 1939. On her return to Britain, Nancy Lambton was appointed senior lecturer in Persian at SOAS, gaining promotion to reader in 1948, and to the Chair in Persian in 1953. On her retirement in 1979 she became Professor Emeritus and an honorary fellow, and continued to take an interest in academic institutions connected to Iran. In particular, she was a staunch friend to the British Institute of Persian Studies (BIPS), being instrumental in the retention of the threatened BIPS library and meeting rooms in Teheran. She received many honours, beginning with an OBE in 1942. She was a Fellow of the British Academy, and an honorary Fellow of New Hall, Cambridge. Nancy Lambton's fearless integrity and general austerity made an impression on all who met her. She could be formidable in her treatment of time-wasters, but was patient with those who were seriously trying to find their way in her field and encouraging to all enthusiasts. She never married, but was always intensely loyal to her family. No one who met her could fail to notice that she possessed striking good looks. Family legend had it that, when she was a young girl in Paris, her beauty caused men in cafés to stand on their chairs and applaud as she passed by. Later, her well-cut tweed coats and skirts made no concessions to changing fashions. Nothing could have been more sensible than her shoes.After horses had ceased to play a leading part in her life, Nancy Lambton became a determined bicyclist, both in London and in the desert wastes of Iran. She also played a strong game of squash and, rather like Gladstone, found working with an axe a good relaxation from intellectual exercise. She felled trees and split logs with skill and gusto. Living in retirement at Kirk Newton, in a small house near her family's estate in north Northumberland, she enjoyed lambing. She was an devout Christian and gave unstinting support to Jerusalem and the Middle East Church Association which sustained a link with the Anglican communities of the Middle East. She served for many years on the JMEC Advisory Council. In the dioceses of Durham and Newcastle she made her mark through a series of Lenten lectures, in addition to playing a part in her home parish church of St Gregory, where she remained faithful to the Book of Common Prayer. The Lambeth Cross of St Augustine was presented to her in 2004 in recognition of her long and distinguished service and commitment to Christianity and the Church of England.

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

After Publishing This peice - The newspaper is closed and the publisher taken to prison!

سایت نواندیش: رسول منتجب‌نيا در «اعتمادملي» روز سه‏شنبه نوشت: اين مطلب به دنبال طرح برخي مباحث
خرافه‌گرايانه در سال‌هاي اخير در كشور نگارش يافته و به نقد اين انديشه‌ها پرداخته است. كه در ادامه آن با طرح چند سوال از رئيس‌جمهور و استمداد از علما و مراجع تقليد آفات رواج اين خرافات گوشزد شده است. بدون شك علماي بزرگوار شيعه در طول تاريخ تشيع، پاسداران حريم عقايد و احكام اسلا‌م و مذهب شيعه بوده و در برابر هرگونه كج‌انديشي و كجروي به شدت مقابله كرده و در اين راه جمع زيادي از بهترين آنان به شهادت رسيده‌اند.يكي از انحرافات و كج‌انديشي‌هاي ديني، ظهور بدعت در دين و افزودن به مفاهيم و احكام اسلا‌م و مذهب توسط شيادان و فرصت‌طلبان بوده است كه به حكم «اذا ظهرت البدع فللعالم ان يظهر علمه و الا‌ فعليه لعنه الله» عالمان ديني با تمام قدرت بدعت‌ها و نوآوري‌هاي غيرديني به نام دين را زدوده و دست پليد بدعت‌گذاران را كوتاه كرده‌اند. از اين رو، سلا‌طين، پادشاهان و قدرت‌هاي جهاني تاكنون نتوانسته‌اند ساحت مقدس اسلا‌م، تشيع و اهل بيت عصمت و طهارت را ملكوك و مخدوش سازند. يكي از عقايد شيعه كه مي‌توانست وسيله سوءاستفاده شيادان واقع شود اعتقاد به اصل مهدويت و انديشه مترقي و حركت‌ساز انتظار فرج است كه همه طرفداران اديان آسماني به نحوي اين عقيده را داشته و در انتظار منجي عالم بشريت مي‌باشند. در روايات رسيده از ائمه طاهرين عليهم السلا‌م، ضمن تاكيد فراوان بر اصل مهدويت و بشارت قطعي به ظهور حضرت ولي عصر عجل الله تعالي فرجه الشريف، به منظور پيشگيري از هرگونه انحراف و سوءاستفاده افراد از اين عقيده ريشه‌دار، توصيه‌هاي اكيدي به عمل آمده است، از جمله: 1- نهي از تعيين زمان ظهور آن حضرت و بيان اينكه اين امر از اسرار الهي است و كسي جز خداوند نسبت به آن آگاهي ندارد با اين عبارت كه «ما اهل بيت هرگز زمان ظهور را تعيين نخواهيم كرد» يا «دروغ مي‌گويند تعيين‌كنندگان زمان براي ظهور حضرت ! دروغ مي‌گويند...! دروغ مي‌گويند...!» ‌2- توصيه به تكذيب هر كسي كه ادعاي مشاهده و زيارت حضرت مهدي(عج) را بكند و او را كاذب و افترازننده معرفي كردن. ما در يادداشت قبلي برخي از روايات فوق را به‌طور مستند از كتاب‌هاي معتبر روايي نقل كرديم. نقل قول‌ها و شايعات: از زمان روي كار آمدن آقاي احمدي‌نژاد و دولت ايشان، در ميان خواص و اخيرا عامه مردم، يعني مردم كوچه و بازار مطالبي به نقل از رئيس‌جمهور و برخي معاونين و نزديكان ايشان، روي زبان‌ها جاري است و بسياري از آن مطالب به صورت مستند و با ذكر زمان و مكان و گوينده‌هاي آنها نقل مي‌شود. از باب مثال:الف: در سال اول رياست‌جمهوري آقاي احمدي‌نژاد، با دو واسطه نقل شد كه ايشان در سفر استاني به سيستان و بلوچستان و در پاسخ به اعتراض يكي از معاونين كه اعتبارات كشور محدود است و چرا اين همه وعده‌هاي ده‌ها ميليارد توماني به هر شهر داده مي‌شود، گفته است: «نگران نباشيد دو سال ديگر امام زمان (عج) ظهور مي‌كند و همه مشكلا‌ت را حل مي‌كند.» ‌ب: نماينده‌اي از شوراي اسلا‌مي، نقل مي‌كرد روزي در ملا‌قات رئيس‌جمهور با مقام معظم رهبري ايشان نسبت به اظهاراتش و وعده ظهور حضرت در دو سال ديگر مورد اعتراض شديد رهبري واقع شد و در جواب گفت: «كساني كه با ايشان در تماس هستند، گفته‌اند» و پس از خروج از دفتر رهبري، اظهار كرده است: «ايشان تصور مي‌كند من رئيس‌جمهور او هستم، من رئيس‌جمهور امام زمان(عج) مي‌باشم.» ‌ج: پس از سفر به نيويورك و شركت در اجلا‌س سازمان ملل، در ملا‌قات با آيت‌الله جوادي‌آملي، اظهار كرده است: «هنگام سخنراني ‌هاله‌اي از نور اطراف سر و صورت خود مشاهده كردم و همه مخاطبان ميخكوب شده و مجذوب من گرديدند» كه مورد انتقاد و بي‌اعتنايي آيت‌الله جوادي‌آملي قرار گرفت و سي‌دي اين ملا‌قات در سطح وسيع در ميان مردم پخش شده است. د: بين خواص شايع است كه گاهي سر سفره خوراك، يك بشقاب و قاشق و چنگال را در جاي خالي كنار گذاشته و اظهار مي‌كنند اين براي آقا امام زمان است. هـ: شخصي نقل كرده است، روزي يكي از نزديكان رئيس‌جمهور من را دعوت به شركت در نماز جماعت آقا كرد و من به تصور اينكه امام جماعت، مقام رهبري است با او به محلي رفتيم. وقت نماز مشاهده كردم صف نماز تشكيل شد در حالي كه امام جماعت حضور ندارد و فقط سجاده‌اي پهن است، وقتي سوال كردم كه رهبري كي تشريف مي‌آورند؟ گفتند: هيس ! امام جماعت، حضرت ولي عصر(عج) است.و: اخيراً بارها در اظهارات رئيس‌جمهور، معاونين، مشاورين و... اين جمله فراوان به كار مي‌رود كه اين دولت را امام زمان(عج) مديريت يا اداره مي‌فرمايد. و موارد فراوان ديگر.ز: در روزهاي گذشته آقاي رئيس‌جمهور كساني را كه ‌هاله نور را انكار مي‌كنند به مخدوش بودن عقيده متهم كرده است و مشاور رئيس‌جمهور در امور روحانيت طي مصاحبه‌اي، از تقدير و تشكر مراجع عظام و علما و روحانيون از رئيس‌جمهور در خصوص مورد عنايت ولي عصر(عج) بودن و استقبال فضلا‌ از سخنان رئيس‌جمهوري، حكايت كرده و منتقدان را به «مشكل داشتن در اصل مهدويت» و «ترديد در اعتقاد به ولي عصر (عج)» متهم كرده و دستور داده است كه «بايد در اعتقادات خود تجديدنظر كنند.» ‌چند سوال از رئيس‌جمهور: ‌صرف‌نظر از اينكه چنين شايعاتي چگونه اعتقادات مردم و نسل جوان را تضعيف مي‌كند و مورد استهزا و تمسخر دستگاه‌هاي تبليغاتي بيگانه و دشمنان اسلا‌م و تشيع قرار گرفته است و قطع نظر از اينكه نتيجه اين سخنان، انتساب همه ضعف‌ها، كاستي‌ها، سوءمديريت‌ها، افزايش تورم و گراني و... به حضرت ولي‌عصر(عج) مي‌باشد و اين بزرگ‌ترين ظلم و جفا و توهين به ساحت آن حضرت است.1- آيا اين نقل قول‌ها و شايعات در محافل خصوصي و عمومي راست است يا دروغ؟ خواهش مي‌كنيم خيلي صريح و شفاف پاسخ دهيد و از كلي‌گويي يا فرافكني يا متهم كردن ديگران پرهيز كنيد. 2- اگر حتي يك مورد آن راست و صادق است شما اين عقيده را كه برخلا‌ف نظريه همه علماي شيعه از صدر تاكنون است، از كجا آورده‌ايد و در برابر آن همه روايت معتبر و فرمايشات بزرگان شيعه چه پاسخي داريد؟ ‌3- اگر راست است، مقصود شما از بيان اين مطالب غيرواقعي چيست؟ آيا تصور مي‌كنيد اين سخنان، مي‌تواند نارضايتي و اعتراضات مردم را نسبت به گراني، تورم و سوءمديريت دولت توجيه كند؟ ‌4- اگر راست است، پس از گذشت 3 سال و كذب بودن اين وعده‌ها، مسوول مخدوش شدن عقايد مردم و جوانان چه افرادي خواهند بود؟! چند سوال از مراجع تقليد و فضلا‌: ‌1- آيا دستور فرموده‌ايد درباره اين نقل‌قول‌هاي شايع و رايج بررسي كنند؟! ‌2- آيا به نظر مبارك آقايان تمامي اين نقل‌ها دروغ و كذب است؟! 3- اگر حتي يك مورد از اين ادعاها، صحت نقل داشته باشد، آيا جاي آن نيست كه در برابر آن با شدت و قاطعيت ايستادگي كنيد و از حريم عقايد اسلا‌مي و شيعي ناب پاسداري فرماييد؟ ‌4- آيا نقل قول مشاور رئيس‌جمهور، مبني بر "استقبال فضلا‌ از سخنان رئيس‌جمهوري و تقدير مراجع عظام، علما و روحانيون از رئيس‌جمهور در خصوص مورد عنايت حضرت ولي‌عصر(عج) بودن" صحيح است يا دروغ؟ ‌5- اگر صحيح است چرا؟ و اگر دروغ و تهمت است چرا تكذيب نمي‌فرماييد؟!


Sunday, May 18, 2008

Taking Liberties (Since 1997)

Revolver Entertainment - 101 min - Feb 7, 2008

TAKING LIBERTIES is a shocking but hilarious polemic documentary that charts the destruction of all your Basic Liberties under 10 Years of N...all » TAKING LIBERTIES is a shocking but hilarious polemic documentary that charts the destruction of all your Basic Liberties under 10 Years of New Labour. Released to coincide with Tony Blair's departure, the film and the book follow the stories of normal people who's lives have been turned upside down by injustice - from being arrested for holding a placard outside parliament to being tortured in Guantanamo Bay. THIS IS WHAT YOU DON'T READ IN THE PAPERS! THIS IS WHAT YOU DON'T SEE ON TV! AND IT'S HAPPENING TO YOU!



Waking_life

Friday, March 07, 2008

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Islamic Republic of Disaster- Islamic Republic of Idiots

The Ayatollahs' Illusion of Invincibility
Proponents of conciliation maintain that engaging Tehran is the only practical way to counter the nuclear and regional threats posed by the ayatollahs. Why? Because, they say, Iran under the ayatollahs’ rule is a “rising regional power,” stable at home and hugely influential in Iraq. So the West must tread carefully. Never mind that engaging a religious dictatorship hell-bent on erecting an Islamic fundamentalist empire is nothing short of capitulation and appeasement of the worst kind.
Dear Iranians: Have the Courage to Say No to Islam
Amil Imani -- Nearly 1400 years ago, a group of nomads from across the scorching Arabian Desert conquered Iran (Persia), the greatest empire known to the history of mankind. With that, they injected their Islamic virus into the veins of their victim: the Iranian people.
Stronger Iran sanctions negotiated ... Supreme leader rebukes Iranian president ... Palestinians breach wall, flood into Egypt ... UN Security Council resolution on Iran agreed -Jan 22, 2008 : UN Security Council resolution on Iran agreed -xinhuanet_en -JRCSafeguards; -Nuclear; -REN-Security; - SecurityCouncil; - Iran-NuclearReprocessing;
BEIJING, Jan. 23 -- The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany have agreed on a new draft resolution to strengthen sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program. The foreign ministers of the United States, Germany, China, France, Britain and Russia agreed on the major points of a UN resolution on Iran....
There Is No "War On Terror
"Edward S. Herman and David Peterson have crafted a well-documented piece that lays out the whole fraud of the "War on Terror", the whole bloody sham that cloaks the resurrection from the Undead of "Manifest Destiny", the elitist fantasy to subjugate the planet. Wake up, world, before it is too late.
US- Iran Relations: Fifty Years of Deceit -
Meanwhile, what is happening in the everyday reality of US-Iran relations? Each day we see on TV the gray, menacing US warships sitting just off Iran’s coast at the Straits of Hormuz. What we don’t see is the US threatening buildup in Azerbaijan along the Caspian Sea on Iran’s northwest borders. What we don’t see is the war that the United States and Great Britain have been waging against Iran for at least two years. Actually, for fifty years. -Countercurrent 1/19/08
US Falls Short On New Iran Sanctions
The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany agreed Tuesday to impose new sanctions on Iran over its suspect nuclear program, yet the measures appeared to fall short of what the Bush administration had wanted.
How Free Is The "Free Market"
?The mainstream media - and therefore much of the general public - are under the misconception that what currently exists in the US and industrialized Western countries is a free market. AND they are convinced that the Free Market is failing..... very badly.
France Says New Iran Resolution Imminent
Opposition from Russia and China to quick and harsh new sanctions has increased since the U.S. report, but Western nations have stressed the need to keep up the pressure. Iran insists it never had a weapons program and that its uranium enrichment is aimed at energy production.
Iran finds new ways to beat sanctions
Jan 22 2008 22:54The Bush administration probably was not thinking about Shrek, Elmo and Spongebob Square Pants when it started warning international banks against doing business with Iran
Coalition Completes Aerial Bomb Blitz of Al Qaeda Sanctuary
BAGHDAD - Thousands of pounds of bombs rained down near the village of Arab Jabour on Jan. 20, as coalition forces continued their relentless pursuit of al Qaeda.
Al Qaeda Can Run, But Can't Hide in Northern Iraq
WASHINGTON - The tables have turned for al Qaeda in northern Iraq, as a surge of operations there in the new year has put terrorists on the run looking for new places to hide, a commander in the region said today.Jan 23, 2008,
Coalition Forces in Iraq Capture 18 Terrorists
WASHINGTON - Coalition forces today captured 18 suspected terrorists during anti-insurgent operations conducted across northern Iraq and the Baghdad area, military officials said.
Powers must close "gaps" for Iran sanctions deal
World powers said they would have to overcome key differences on Tuesday to agree on a new sanctions resolution against Iran that aims to ratchet up pressure on Tehran to curb sensitive
nuclear work. -Reuters 1/22/08
Westminster Committee on Iran launches online discussion forum -
The Westminster Committee on Iran today launched an online discussion forum providing a mechanism for academics, parliamentarians and policy makers around the world to discuss issues and share information on the growing standoff with Iran. 1/21/08
Radical left growing as Iran political force -
In early December, a surprising scene played out at Tehran University: 500 Marxist students held aloft portraits of Che Guevara to protest President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's policies. Smaller groups of Marxist students staged similar protests in several other cities. -IHT 1/19/08

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Iran is continuing to supply weapons and personnel to train insurgents in Iraq.

In December, the Pentagon issued a report to Congress titled "Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq" stating that Iran is continuing to supply weapons and personnel to train insurgents in Iraq. But now a top U.S. commander in Iraq told The Washington Times that "Iran no longer aids Iraq militants". What is going on? What has changed?
January 3, 2008 : By
Sara A. Carter reports that " Iran's leaders are no longer supplying weapons or training to Islamic militants in Iraq ", according to the spokesman for the top U.S. commander in Iraq who told The Washington Times. that Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, sees Iran as following through on assurances it made to Iraqi and U.S. officials last fall not to assist extremists in Iraq, spokesman Col. Steven Boylan said, adding that other U.S. officials have noted declines in Iranian weapons and funds to Iraqi insurgents. "We are ready to confirm the excellence of the senior Iranian leadership in their pledge to stop the funding, training, equipment and resourcing of the militia special groups," Col. Boylan said. "We have seen a downward trend in the signature-type attacks using weapons provided by Iran."
In October, U.S. military officials began noticing a decrease in the supply of Iranian weapons and assistance, Col. Boylan added. The disclosure comes just weeks after a National Intelligence Estimate pruned back its assessment of Iran's nuclear program, saying "with high confidence" that the Islamic republic had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 in the wake of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Tehran's aid for Islamic militias in Iraq and its nuclear program have resulted in calls from some in Washington for military action against Iran, and these two developments are likely to dampen such calls. Some outside analysts have argued, though, that Iran-based aid may be getting to Iraqi insurgents without the approval of the government in Tehran. But the colonel cautioned that while Iran's efforts are promising, U.S. military officials remain wary, partly over some contrary events on the ground in Iraq. For example, he disclosed that U.S. troops "recently captured individuals who have been in Iran, training, as short as 45-60 days ago." He did not elaborate on the circumstances surrounding the captured individuals or the possible investigation. "We are very much in the wait-and-see mode to see what happens," Col. Boylan said. In July, four terrorists linked to an Iranian smuggling operation — responsible for targeting coalition forces with powerful bombs — were captured in Iraq. The confirmation of Iran's cooperation also comes at a time when U.S. military officials have confirmed a 60 percent decrease in violence, including improvised explosive device attacks and civilian deaths in Iraq. Last year, U.S. military officials publicly released evidence of links between Iran and insurgents, including weapons, such as improvised explosive devices and mortars, that bore the markings of Iran's Revolutionary Guard. The smuggling of deadly explosively formed projectiles (EFPs) — warhead-style weapons that can pierce armor and that have caused the most casualties and damage to U.S. forces — also was traced back to Iran. In December, the Pentagon issued a report to Congress titled "Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq" stating that Iran is continuing to supply weapons and personnel to train insurgents in Iraq. It suggested that the recent declines in violence aren't the result of Iran's claims that it has squelched involvement in Iraq but to other factors, such as the troop surge. "There has been no identified decrease in Iranian training and funding of illegal Shi'a militias in Iraq," the report stated. "Tehran's support for Shi'a militant groups who attack Coalition and Iraq forces remains a significant impediment to progress toward stabilization." Army Lt. Col. Mark Ballesteros, a Pentagon spokesman, said the words from Gen. Petraeus' office on Iran's cutting aid don't contradict the Department of Defense Iraq report, because it was based on information obtained prior to the end of the November deadline. "The report we issued to Congress is meant to be retrospective in nature," Col. Ballesteros said. "It is meant to cover the last 90 days of data and provides a snapshot of that period on the ground." Col. Boylan stated that despite Iran's current cooperation, Islamic radicals and terrorist groups still pose a serious danger to stability in the region.

Rice and Gates Divided over Iran's Role in Iraq : Analysis by Gareth Porter*
WASHINGTON, Jan 2 (IPS) - A State Department official's assertion in late December that Iran had exerted a restraining influence on Iraqi Shiite militia violence signaled a major divergence of views between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Defence Robert Gates over how to portray Iran's role in Iraq.In an interview with the Washington Post published Dec. 23, David Satterfield, a senior advisor to Rice and coordinator for Iraq, attributed to Iran a deliberate decision to help calm the situation in Iraq rather than to inflame it. Satterfield told the Washington Post that the decline in the number of attacks by Mahdi Army militiamen since August "has to be attributed to an Iranian policy decision" and suggested that the policy decision had been made "at the most senior level". Satterfield did not say that the new Iranian policy line was permanent, but he insisted that there had been such a "consistent and sustained diminution in certain kinds of violence by certain kinds of folks" that it could not be explained solely on the basis of internal factors in Iraq. U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker also told the Post that "the freeze on JAM [the Iraqi acronym for the Mahdi Army] operations that began four months ago would not exist without Iranian approval". Those positive descriptions of the recent Iranian role in Iraq came just after Defence Secretary Gates had refused to endorse such an assessment. At a press conference on Dec. 21, Gates was asked whether he had "seen any additional or more current information to suggest maybe Iran is playing a more constructive role in trying to seal its border from arms shipments and so on?" He replied, "No, not yet." Significantly, however, Gates also passed up the opportunity to say that Iran was playing a "destabilising role" in Iraq. Instead he said simply that the "jury is out" on the issue. Gates mentioned the success of military operations against the Mahdi Army as well as the "ceasefire that has been put in place" as factors in the decline in attacks and said, "[W]e don't have a good feeling...or any confidence in terms of how to weigh these different things." These differing views on whether Iran has been playing a positive role in Iraq are the first clear evidence of a split between Gates and Rice over how to deal with Iran. Rice's State Department is now leaning toward treating Iran as something other than an outright enemy in regard to Iraq, whereas Gates is not ready to soften the administration's position of casting suspicion on Iranian intentions. Gates was the last administration official to denounce Iran in harsh terms over Iraq, declaring in a speech at a Persian Gulf security conference in Bahrain Dec. 8, "Everywhere you turn, it is the policy of Iran to foment instability and chaos, no matter the strategic value or cost in the blood of innocents." That rhetoric was almost certainly aimed, however, at avoiding a stampede away from the administration's efforts to pressure Iran on its uranium enrichment programme in the wake of the stunning publication of the national intelligence estimate's conclusion that Iran had abandoned covert nuclear weapons work in 2003.
Gates hinted in comments to reporters when he arrived in Bahrain that he was much less certain of the Iranian intention than his rhetoric at the conference would have suggested. He mentioned the call by Shiite Mahdi Army leader Muqtada al-Sadr for a ceasefire as a key factor in the improved security in the Baghdad area, along with the reduction in attacks by armour-piercing rounds which had long been blamed on Iran. Gates appeared to suggest that he did not rule out an Iranian contribution to the improvement, saying it was "too early to tell" whether the reduction in militia attacks since August was due to successful military efforts to disrupt Mahdi Army networks or "what the Iranians may or may not be doing". The State Department's decision to acknowledge that Iran has contributed to the reduction in violence in Iraq has no doubt been influenced by Iranian political figures and officials who work closely with the U.S. Embassy to oppose the Mahdi Army and who have been insisting for months that Iran was helping to restrain Sadr. Iraqi Islamic Council Chairman Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, whose party is the key Shiite political ally in the U.S. effort to weaken the Madhi Army, met with Rice Nov. 30 and told her that Iran plays a positive role in establishing security in Iraq, according to the Tehran Times. Al-Hakim was quoted as saying, "There are documents proving that Iran has supported Iraq." Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, who had argued both publicly and privately last fall that Iran was behind Sadr's Aug. 29 ceasefire, met with Rice two days before the Satterfield and Crocker interviews. The implication of the advice of the anti-Sadr, pro-Iranian Iraqis is that the United States can use Iran to further weaken Sadr and the Madhi Army. The State Department strategy recognises that the Madhi Army, which poses the main threat to the George W. Bush administration's plan to maintain an indefinite U.S. military presence in the country, is too strong to be suppressed by U.S. or Iraqi military forces. And it would seek an end to the accusations against Iran regarding Iraqi Shiite militias that have been issued regularly by U.S. civilian and military officials throughout 2007. Crocker told the Post he was prepared to make the inference of a helpful Iranian role in the reduction of operations by the Shiite militias when he meets with Iran in the next round of talks. The Defence Department's view of Iranian policy is influenced primarily by the perspective of the U.S. military command in Baghdad. Gen. David Petraeus also recognises that there must be a political strategy to weaken Sadr's forces. However, he and his staff have been focusing more on the fact that the Madhi Army is continuing to attack U.S. and Iraqi security forces in the Shiite provinces of Qadisiyah, Babil and Dhi Qar, as stated in the latest Pentagon report. The military command continues to insists that the "Shi'a extremists and rogue elements" of the Mahdi Army are "Iranian-backed". That analysis clearly implies that the United States should not back away from the accusations of Iranian export of weapons to and manipulation of Shiite militias that the U.S. command has been making for nearly a year. Given President Bush's penchant for letting agencies with conflicting policies work things out themselves rather than impose a policy decision, the State and Defence Departments may continue to carry out their own policy lines on the subject of Iran's role in Iraq until a new development resolves the differences. That will introduce another layer of contradictions into an extraordinarily murky policy toward the Iran-Iraq complex of issues. *Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy. His latest book, "Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam", was published in June 2005.

AND HERE COMES THE DENIAL ....

Petraeus Aide Denies Report That Iran Is Not Aiding Iraq Militants
January 03, 2008 Fox News foxnews.com
A spokesman for Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the Multi-National Force in Iraq, denied a story published Thursday in the Washington Times that said Petraeus believed Iran no longer was training or supplying weapons to Islamic militants in Iraq. Col. Steven Boylan told FOX News that the article, purported to include quotes from Petraeus and Boylan, "is inaccurate." "We do not know if there has been a decrease in the supply of Iranian weapons," Boylan wrote to news outlets that picked up the Washington Times story. "It is not clear if Iran's leaders stopped supplying weapons or training to extremist elements in Iraq. We hope that they have, but until we can confirm it, we are in the wait and see mode. "We have seen a decrease in the attacks using four specific types of Iranian weapons. However, this should not be misunderstood as anything other than lowered levels of attacks using these specific weapons," he wrote. The Times story included what it said was a quote from Boylan, saying, "We are ready to confirm the excellence of the senior Iranian leadership in their pledge to stop the funding, training, equipment and resourcing of the militia special groups. "We have seen a downward trend in the signature-type attacks using weapons provided by Iran." Click here to view the full report in The Washington Times. Several weeks ago the National Intelligence Estimate said that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Monday, December 31, 2007

End Game : The Full Lenght Film : 2 hr 19 min - Oct 26, 2007

For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while enabling the "elites" to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity's extermination: Operation ENDGAME.



James Arthur - Mushrooms and Mankind

James Arthur, one of the worlds leading experts in Ethnomycology, takes you on an exploration of symbolism from modern-day folk traditions to some of the most ancient religious writings known to mankind. The repression of human consciousness and sexuality does more harm to mankind than we could have possibly imagined. Why is it that these things are considered Taboo? The answers will amaze you!
















Monday, November 12, 2007

Latest News

US Military: Qaeda Losing Support but Iranian Arms Still Problem in Iraq
BAGHDAD -- Al-Qaeda is losing ground south of Baghdad but Iranian weapons still "trouble" US forces despite Tehran's assurance that it has halted the flow of arms into Iraq, a US commander said on Sunday. By AFP

Along Iraq-Turkey Border, Kurdish Guerrillas Remain Resolute
RANJ PRAKH, Iraq -- In the jagged mountains of northern Iraq, hard-bitten Kurdish fighters are increasingly besieged. To the west and north, Turkish troops are massed along Iraq's border. From the east, Iranian artillery is shelling the guerrillas' bases. And now from the south, Iraq's government, under heavy U.S. pressure, has begun to suppress the only sanctuaries the fighters have known for more than three decades. By The Washington Post

White House Frustrated with Brown Over Iran
The Bush administration is losing patience with Gordon Brown over Iran, with senior American diplomats frustrated by his reluctance to declare bluntly that the Islamic state must never be allowed nuclear weapons. By Telegraph

Times for Tehran
In early October, French government officials in Paris received a highly sensitive memo from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna suggesting that Iran could have just under 3,000 uranium enriching centrifuges operating in tandem at its nuclear plant in Natanz by the end of the month. A translation of the memo, seen by The Jerusalem Report, referred to "18 interlinked cascades" of 164 centrifuges in each, making a grand total of 2,952. Western experts say 3,000 centrifuge machines running smoothly for long periods at supersonic speeds could enrich enough uranium for the manufacture of a nuclear bomb within a year.

Is Osama bin Laden Dead? November 11, 2007 at 11:11:05

Is Osama bin Laden Dead? Part 3: Confession as Theater : by Mac McKinney Page 1 of 3 page(s) - http://www.opednews.com/

'The linchpin of the War on Terror has been 9/11, and the pin itself has always been Osama bin Laden. However, this pin is not made of stainless steel, but smoke and mirrors. In Part 2 we looked at videotapes that surfaced right after 9/11 and now in Part 3 we will continue to focus on those tapes up thru Dec 2001, including the confession tapes, yes, plural, because there was one, allegedly, that never quite made it to press.';

As I said in Part 1 of this series, "Given all the above evidence and statements, particularly the accounts of his hospital visits for kidney dialysis, it is certainly reasonable and logical to conclude that bin Laden expired in December of 2001......So what was it that brought him back to life after even multiple commentators buried him, a life that keeps on going and going, just like the Energizer Bunny Rabbit, in the mainstream media globally to this very day? The answer, in a word: TAPES...." (click here to read Part 1) - In Part 2 (click here to read Part 2), we looked at bin Laden's first two tapes after 9/11 and his written interview with Ummat Newspaper in September 2001. In Part 3, I will continue to focus on the Osama bin Laden video tapes between 9/11 and the end of 2001. There were, according to authorities, three (sort of) more tapes besides the first two, two of them being released to the public, and the other one, a mystery tape, never seeing the light of day publicly. Chronologically, this mystery tape was first headlined in the British Daily Telegraph on Nov 11, 2001, although the article indicates the actual tape was made some two weeks earlier. This dramatic news was just a week or so after bin Laden's Nov. 4 outdoor videotape, Tape #2 for our purposes, in which he is completely opaque about any involvement in 9/11, acting as if he was more of a spectator commenting on the event. But the mystery tape now overrides that posture with this blaring headline:
Bin Laden: Yes, I did it

OSAMA BIN LADEN has for the first time admitted that his al-Qa'eda group carried out the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the Telegraph can reveal. ( By David Bamber : Last Updated: 12:41am GMT 11/11/2001) In a previously undisclosed video which has been circulating for 14 days among his supporters, he confesses that "history should be a witness that we are terrorists. Yes, we kill their innocents". In the footage, shot in the Afghan mountains at the end of October, a smiling bin Laden goes on to say that the World Trade Centre's twin towers were a "legitimate target" and the pilots who hijacked the planes were "blessed by Allah". The killing of at least 4,537 people was justified, he claims, because they were "not civilians" but were working for the American system......(source and rest of article)

Then, some three days later, on November 14, Tony Blair gave a speech in parliament based on the same video's contents. To quote from Maher Osseiran in his article Bush, Blair and the Osama Tapes (If the Moon Could Talk, What Would it Say?): .....Blair addressed parliament and informed the audience that the British Government (had) published transcript excerpts of the "video" in which it says Bin Laden admitted taking his campaign to the United States. The article (a Nov 14 CNN article) quotes bin Laden as saying: "It is what we instigated for awhile, in self-defence. If avenging the killing of our people is terrorism, let history be a witness that we are terrorists. The battle has been moved inside America, and we shall continue until we win this battle, or die in the cause and meet our maker." Now since Jalalabad fell on Nov. 14, the same day Mr. Blair uttered that quote in parliament, and, the president of the United States' first exposure to the "American video" recovered in Jalalabad was not until Nov. 29, one has to assume that the "video" Mr. Blair is referring to is a different "video". After all, if it is the same "video", how could Mr. Blair have knowledge of something that has not yet existed? (source)
But after such a dramatic pronouncement before the public, this Tsunami-like evidence of bin Laden's alleged confession, far from being revealed to the world, suddenly fell into a black hole. On the same day Blair spoke, to again quote Maher Osseiran: ....the tape commits a disappearing act and this is how T.R. Reid, the Washington Post Foreign Service correspondent, reports from London on its official introduction in Parliament by Tony Blair; he writes: "The British government did not release the video or a full transcript, saying it does not have a copy of the video but has information about it from intelligence sources." In the same article, he also reports that there was an interviewer on the tape. (source)

Please read the rest of this article here : 1 2 3

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Britain's New Afghanistan Plan - Pay Farmers To Ditch Opium - 2007-11-10 Intellpuke

Troops may target drug factories as part of new strategy to combat Taliban.British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is planning a radical scheme to subsidize farmers in Afghanistan to persuade them to stop producing heroin, as part of a wide-ranging drive to re-energize policy in the conflict the prime minister now regards as the front line in the fight against terrorism.
Britain's Foreign Office minister Lord Malloch-Brown has admitted that the rise in opium production in the country means Britain "cannot just muddle along in the middle" and must come up with more imaginative ideas on opium eradication. Ministers are looking at what Lord Malloch-Brown describes as a system of payments loosely along the lines of the common agricultural policy to woo the Afghan farmers off opium production. The government is conducting joint research on suitable economic incentives with the World Bank.British and allied forces are also looking at destroying drug factories inside Afghanistan, and a much better-targeted drive against the big traffickers responsible for 90% of the opium which reaches the west. Brown is expected to make a House of Commons statement on security and development in Afghanistan in the next few weeks, and is likely to highlight the strategic importance of the war against the Taliban in his first annual foreign affairs speech at Mansion House on Monday.
The focus on Afghanistan comes as British troop levels there are now higher than in Iraq. There are approximately 7,700 British troops in Afghanistan, compared with around 5,000 in Iraq.
Critics in the British aid agencies claim that too little western aid is set aside to provide alternative livelihoods for opium farmers in Afghanistan, and comparatively too much going on building state structures or funding public sector salaries. Senior British officers believe the Afghan war remains largely misunderstood in Britain, and say security is the precondition for building alternatives to opium production. Lord Malloch-Brown recently returned from Afghanistan to tell peers: "The Department of International Development is looking at whether we can put on a more formal and structured long-term basis what one would controversially describe as an Afghan equivalent of a CAP, with subsidised purchase of legal crops to make returns more like those from poppy." He added: "We have to do a much better job of not targeting the farmers, the producers whose hearts and minds we are trying to win in the counter-insurgency effort. We have to target the industry above that - the financiers, the shippers, the drug big men who are benefiting from the production. We know who they are and the government of Afghanistan know who they are. A system banning them from travel, listing them and freezing their bank accounts, hitting at the industry's infrastructure, strikes me as an area in which more can be done." He pointedly added that only the U.S. favored aerial spraying of opium crops. Illegal Afghan opium was selling for as much as $125 per kilo in 2006. The United Nations said the area under cultivation rose this year from 165,000 to 193,000 hectares and the harvest rose from 6,100 to 8,200 tons. Opium production is heavily concentrated in areas of insecurity, with the British area of responsibility in Helmand now the world's biggest source of illicit drugs. The U.K. has provided $20 million to an Afghan criminal justice task force that has managed to secure only 400 convictions. Some influential figures, including the former Foreign Office permanent secretary Lord Jay, have become so despairing of the fight that they are backing calls for opium to be produced legally and used as medical morphine, but the idea appears to have been rejected. Christian Aid has also called for an aid switch to improving irrigation and water management; achieving food security through expanded cereal production; credit facilities for farmers; and building export markets for fruit and nuts.

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Once a Commie Traitor, always a Cammi Traitor - But why does she have to be so UGLY !

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usImage Hosted by ImageShack.us
فارس: 13 آبان - تسخير لانه جاسوسي آمريكا - تكرار شدني است؟ -رجايي‌فر: عليه انگليس ان شاء الله؟ *فارس: يك حرفهايي به ندرت در ميان دانشجويان در اين زمينه زده مي‌شود. -رجايي‌فر: من كه آماده‌ام اگر موقعيت دست بدهد (باخنده) به خاطر اينكه فكر مي‌كنم اينها هنوز براي ما نقشه‌ها دارند. حالا من به جوانها توصيه مهمي كه دارم اين است كه به جاي خلق 13 آبان جديد همان 13 آبان را حفظ كنند و مراقب باشند و نگذارند سفارت آمريكا رد ايران بازگشايي شود. اين كه مي‌گويم يك واقعيتي است. *فارس: يعني فكر مي‌كنيد ممكن است سفارت آمريكا در ايران بازگشايي شود؟ -رجايي‌فر: بله به اين دليل كه 2 نظر در آمريكا در خصوص را در جلسه با ايران وجود دارد، يكي از آنها اين است كه گروهي از آنها مي‌گويند ما نبايد موجوديت جمهوري اسلامي را به رسميت بشناسيم و بايد جمهوري اسلامي را از بين ببريم و براندازي كنيم و به همين دليل بحث مذاكره و رابطه با ايران بي‌معنا است. اما نظر ديگر در آمريكا اين است كه با ايران مذاكره كرده و رابطه ايجاد كنيم.حالا بعضي در داخل كشور گمان مي‌كنند اين نظر دوم قصد مصالحه و سازش با جمهوري اسلامي ايران را دارد. اما جالب است كه يك گزارشي را كميته خطر وزارت خارجه آمريكا منتشر كرده با اين مضمون كه به اين علت ما نتوانسته‌ايم جمهوري اسلامي را براندازي كنيم كه در اين كشور سفارتخانه نداريمو و اگر بتوانيم سفارت خود را در ايران بازگشايي كنيم به هدفمان كه براندازي جمهوري اسلامي است، خواهيم رسيد. پس همانطور كه مي‌بينيم هدف هر دو نظر در آمريكا براندازي جمهوري اسلامي ايران .لي بعضي از سياستمدراان ما گول مي‌خورند فكر مي‌كنند آمريكا مي‌خواهد امتيازي را به اينها بدهد. در حالي كه واقعاً هدف آنها در هر حال براندازي نظام است چرا كه مشكلات متعددي با ما دارند و اولين مشكل آنها اين است كه ما در 27-28 سال پيش توازن قدرت را در منطقه به هم زديم و پايگاه‌هايي كه بازي حفظ منابع خودشان ساخته بودند را متلاشي كرديم. اما دومين مشكل ما با آمريكا اين است كه اصلاً ما مشكل ايدئولوژيكي با آمريكا درايم و در مقابل ايدئولوژي ساخته آنها كه ليبرال دموكراسي است ايستاده ايم و مي‌گوييم اين ايدئولوژي براي بشر كفايت نمي‌كند ما مي‌گوييم تمام جناياتي كه رد 200 سال اخير صورت گرفته به دليل همين ليبرذال دموكراسي بوده است. انحطاطات فرهنگي، سياسي، مالي، اخلاقي و ... همه برخاسته از ليبرال دموكراسي است. و در عوض ما مي‌گوييم اسلام، اسلام سياسي و .... همچنين ولايت فقيه را مطرح مي‌كنيم كه خوب اينها چيزهايي است كه پايه‌هايي را كه ليبرال دموكراسي برآن استوار است را به لرزه درآورده است. آمريكا مي‌خواهد ما در اين ايدئولوژي اسلامي خودمان شكست بخوريم تا خودش اثبات شود. يعني همانگونه كه شوروي كمونيسم متلاشي شد تا سرمايه داراي ثبات شود به همان شكل مي‌خواهند اسلام شكست بخوردتا ليبرال دموكراسي اثبات شود. پس آمريكا مي‌خواهد نظام جمهوري اسلامي ايران از هر طريقي كه مي‌شود متلاشي شود و يكي از آن طرق، بازگشايي سفارت آمريكا در ايران است. * بالاخره اقدام عليه سفارت انگليس را توجيه مي‌كنيد؟ - نه اين را توصيه نمي‌كنم، بلكه مي‌گويم اگر دانشجويان خيلي زرنگ هستند، به هوش باشند كه سفارت آمريكا در ايران بازگشايي نشود. * اگر در پايان حرفي داريد كه گفته نشده بفرماييد چند جمله آخر مصاحبه را اينگونه مي‌خواهم به پايان برسانم كه جريان تسخير سفارت آمريكا، تا قبل از تائيد امام و تائيد مردم به دنبال آن، يك جريان دانشجويي بود. اما وقتي امام تائيد كردند و مردم هم پشت سرامام ايستادند و آن را تائيد كردند اين جريان به يك جريان ملي تبديل شد و دانشجويان تبديل به ماموراني شدند كه از طرف ملت ايران اين گروگانهاي آمريكايي را نگهداري مي‌كردند. يعني اينجا ديگر حركت انشجويي نبود بلكه مردمي بود چون اگر حركت مي‌خواست دانشجويي بماند بايد در هما چند ساعت اول دانشجويان را از سفارت بيرون مي‌كردند. بنابراين حمايت مردم از اين حركت موجب تداوم آن شد مردم اجازه دادند به دانشجويان كه گروگان ها را نگهداري كنند تبعات، ناگواري‌ها تلخي‌ها عواقب سنگين اشغال لانه و ... را ملت ايران تحمل كرده است. جنگ ايران و عراق يكي از اين تبعات بوده كودتاي نوراه و ... و حتي تورم امروز به دليل رويارويي مستقيم ايران با آمريكاست. كه از 13 آبان 51 شروع شده است. اين تبعات را مردم ايران با همديگر پرداخت كرده‌اند. پس اين جريان رويارويي با آمريكا يك جريان ملي است و دانشجويي نيست كه حالا مثلاً بگوييم عباس عبدي پشيمان شده و رفته با گروگان دست داده پس حالا ماجرا بين ما و آمريكا تمام است. اصلاً اينگونه نيست و او چنين نمايندگي‌اي ندارد. مردم ايران اگر به دنبال عبدي بودند قطعاً همين كار را بعد از عبدي مي‌كردند اما مردم ايران پيرو امام بودند و امام هيچگاه از اين كار عقب نشيني نكرد و مقام معظم رهبري هم هيچگاه از اين اقدام ابراز تاسف نكرده‌اند و پاي آن ايستاده‌اند. الان بخصوص در چندين ساله اخير جريان مبارزه با آمريكا ازجريان ملي هم تجاوز كرده به يك جريان فراملي و بين‌المللي تبديل شده است يعني ما سردمدار جريان هستم كه در سطح نظام جهاني نبايد از آن كوتاه بياييم و در اين سطح ديگر كسي حق ايجاد رابطه و كودتا آمدن در مقابل آمريكا را ندارد كه بگويد من دوست دارم در دولت من باشد كه روابط با آمريكا بازسازي مي‌شود. من مخالف سرسخت هرگونه مذاكره با آمريكا هستيم و فكر مي‌كنيم كه هر نوع مذاكره، در هر سطحي ضايع كننده جريان مبارزه است. حال اگر بعضي‌ها هم موضوع آمريكا را بهانه كرده‌اند بايد گفت سودي كه طرف آمريكايي مي‌برد بسيار بيشتر از سودي است كه ايران مي‌برد. بنابراين نصيحت من به دانشجويان اين است كه نگذارند مبارزه با ‌آمريكا فراموش شود و چرا كه آمريكايي‌ها همواره به دنبال براندازي نظام اسلامي هستند. و جمله پاياني اينكه شما مراقب باشيد پاي آمريكا در ايران باز نشود و الا انگليس به تنهايي هيچ غلطي نمي‌تواند بكند.
Read the full Article in Persian here : http://tinyurl.com/2yl935

Monday, March 26, 2007

Blair Rebuffed as Crisis with Tehran Deepens

The Times
Richard Beeston, Diplomatic Editor and James Bone in New York



Britain’s crisis with Iran deepened last night after the Iranian Foreign Minister accused a group of captured British servicemen of committing an act of “aggression”, only hours after Tony Blair appealed for their release. “The charge against them is their illegal entrance into Iranian territorial waters,” Manouchehr Mottaki, the Foreign Minister, told a press conference in New York.

Mr Mottaki said that Margaret Beckett, the Foreign Secretary, had requested a telephone conversation with him that was due to take place late last night.

But he said that Iran had already provided British officials with details, including GPS coordinates, of the servicemen’s arrest. The British Ambassador to Tehran was summoned to the Foreign Ministry to explain why 15 service personnel in two inflatable boats had strayed into Iranian territorial waters.

“The Iranian authorities intercepted these sailors and Marines in Iranian waters and detained them in Iranian waters. This has happened in the past as well. In terms of legal issues, it’s under investigation,” Mr Mottaki said. His comments were seen as a direct rebuff to the Prime Minister, who only hours earlier had called the seizure of the British servicemen “unjustified and wrong” and demanded their release.

“This is a very serious situation and there is no doubt at all that these people were taken from a boat in Iraqi waters,” Mr Blair said. “It is simply not true that they went into Iranian territorial waters and I hope the Iranian Government understands how fundamental an issue this is for us.

“We have certainly sent these messages back to them very clearly indeed. I hope this can be resolved over the next few days but the quicker it is resolved the easier it’ll be for all of us. They should not be in any doubt over how seriously we take this act which was unjustified and wrong.”

Mr Mottaki flew to New York for Saturday’s unanimous UN vote to tighten sanctions on Tehran over its suspected nuclear weapons programme, after President Ahmadinejad abruptly cancelled his trip.

Sir Emyr Jones-Parry, Britain’s UN Ambassador, tried unsuccessfully to raise the subject of the servicemen’s fate with the Iranian Foreign Minister in the margins of the UN Security Council.

Behind the scenes, British diplomats worked furiously over the weekend to increase the pressure on Iran to back down by appealing to the regime through friendly third parties. “We have been passing messages for the British and will be taking the matter up at a senior level with the Iranians,” said one foreign diplomat, involved in the negotiations.

Geoffrey Adams, the British Ambassador to Tehran, asked the Iranian Foreign Ministry yesterday where the 15 captives were being held and demanded consular access to them.

So far the Iranians have refused to give any details about their fate, other than to say that they are being well treated.

General Ali Reza Afshar, the Iranian armed forces’ spokesman, said that they had been transferred to Tehran for questioning and that they had “confessed” to an “aggression into the Islamic Republic of Iran’s waters”.

Diplomats involved in the case believe that the British servicemen were ambushed by a naval unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards with the intention of putting pressure on Britain ahead of the key UN Security Council vote to impose sanctions on Tehran for its nuclear programme. If that was the motive, it failed. On Saturday, the day after the abduction, the council voted unanimously to impose sanctions on Iran, banning the export of weapons and freezing the assets of 28 individuals and companies involved in the country’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

The resolution has given Iran 60 days to freeze its uranium enrichment work or it could face further sanctions.

John Bolton, who until recently was the US envoy to the UN, said he believed that the seizure of the British sailors was a “conscious decision by the Tehran Government”, related to the Security Council’s planned sanctions against Iran.

He added: “They were possibly picking on the British because they think the Europeans are the weak link in this.”

2004 capture

— June 18, 2004 Tehran furious at critical International Atomic Energy Agency resolution

— June 21 Eight Royal Marines captured in Shatt al-Arab waterway

— June 22 Iranian TV shows the British boats. The eight are paraded on TV blindfolded and Sergeant Thomas Harkins reads out apology

— June 23 Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary, demands the soldiers’ release

— June 24 Iran frees soldiers but keeps captured boats

ALSO :

Posted 26/3/2007 @ 8:11:42 GMT
Iran Military Warns U.S. Against any Attack
A senior Iranian military official warned the United States against launching any attack on the Islamic Republic, a news agency reported on Monday, two days after the United Nations imposed new sanctions on Iran. "If America starts a war against Iran, it won't be the one who finishes it," Morteza Saffari, naval forces commander of the elite Revolutionary Guards, was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency. more
By Reuters

Posted 26/3/2007 @ 8:7:44 GMT
Iran Thumbs its Nose at the World
The abduction of the 15 British soldiers aboard the HMS Cornwall three days ago is Iran's way of telling or reminding the world that it is a powerful military and regional force, and that the international community should be advised against overstepping its boundaries when it comes to the Islamic Republic's national interests. more
By The Jerusalem Post

Posted 26/3/2007 @ 7:44:34 GMT
Iran: Sanctions Won't Halt Enrichment
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran announced Sunday that it was partially suspending cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog while hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the latest U.N. sanctions would not halt the country's uranium enrichment "even for a second." more
By The Associated Press

Posted 26/3/2007 @ 7:32:48 GMT
Iran Feels Pinch As Major Banks Curtail Business
More than 40 major international banks and financial institutions have either cut off or cut back business with the Iranian government or private sector as a result of a quiet campaign launched by the Treasury and State departments last September, according to Treasury and State officials. more
By The Washington Post

Posted 26/3/2007 @ 7:26:19 GMT
Subverting Iran - Washington's Covert War inside Iran
Much attention has been given to the Bush Administration’s preparations for possible war against Iran as well as its drive to impose sanctions. Meanwhile, a less noticed policy has been unfolding, one that may in time prove to have grave consequences for the region. There is a covert war underway in Iran, still in its infancy, but with disturbing signs of impending escalation. In the shadowy world of guerrilla operations, the full extent of involvement by the Bush Administration has yet to be revealed, but enough is known to paint a disturbing picture. more
By Global Research

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 23:24:58 GMT
US Troops 'Would Have Fought Iranian Captors'
A senior American commander in the Gulf has said his men would have fired on the Iranian Republican Guard rather than let themselves be taken hostage. In a dramatic illustration of the different postures adopted by British and US forces working together in Iraq, Lt-Cdr Erik Horner - who has been working alongside the task force to which the 15 captured Britons belonged - said he was "surprised" the British marines and sailors had not been more aggressive. more
By Independent

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 23:12:2 GMT
Face-off with Iran Takes Tougher Turn
BAGHDAD -- From the United Nations in New York to the Shatt al-Arab waterway that splits southern Iran and Iraq, the ongoing row over Iran's nuclear program turned decidedly more confrontational over the weekend. more
By The Christian Science Monitor

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 23:1:0 GMT
A Saudi-US Fence Around Iran
Iran sent a belligerent warning last Friday: It seized 15 British sailors and marines in the Persian Gulf. The hostile move wasn't aimed only at London. It came just before anti-Iran moves by the UN Security Council and Sunni Arab nations. The real message? "Don't fence us in." more
By The Christian Science Monitor

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 22:30:22 GMT
Iran to Suspend Cooperation With Nuke Watchdog Over Sanctions
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran isn't backing down after a unanimous vote by the U.N. Security Council to impose sanctions, announcing Sunday that it will partially suspend cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency and will be adjusting relations with those nations who voted for sanctions. more
By The Associated Press

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 22:17:38 GMT
America is Looking for a Friend in Khatami
NEW DELHI -- Former Iranian President Mohamed Khatami is regarded as a moderate by the international community. Though after becoming president he disappointed all those who saw him as a pro-reform open-minded leader, Khatami is still seen as a man opposed to President Ahmedinijad’s hardline and often unsophisticated handling of the nuclear stand-off with the US. more
By DNA India

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 21:57:17 GMT
Ahmadinejad Rejects U.N. Sanctions
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is rejecting new United Nations sanctions as illegal, according to IRNA, the state-run Iranian news agency. Ahmadinejad, in an interview with France's Channel 2 TV network, warned nations "seeking to impose sanctions against Iran will suffer a greater damage themselves," IRNA reported. more
By CNN

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 21:48:32 GMT
Iran Says Sailors May Be Charged with Illegal Entry
Iran is considering charging the 15 British personnel it seized on Friday with illegally entering its waters, the country’s foreign minister said on Sunday. Manouchehr Mottaki said the issue was “under consideration under the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran” and that he was due to speak to Margaret Beckett, UK foreign secretary, about the issue later on Sunday. more
By The Financial Times

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 21:23:37 GMT
Blair Warns Iran on Fate of 15 Sailors
British Prime Minister Tony Blair warned Iran on Sunday that the fate of 15 British sailors and marines seized off the Iraqi coast was a "fundamental" issue for his government, as Iran suggested the group may be put on trial for violating its waters. more
By The Associated Press

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 13:13:28 GMT
UK to Avoid Escalation Over Tehran Detainees
The diplomatic crisis over Iran’s arrest of 15 British sailors and marines continued to simmer on Sunday as both sides contemplated their next moves. British officials have been keen not to overplay their reaction to the detention of the sailors - whom it says were on routine policing in Iraqi waters - so as not to elevate the arrests into a larger crisis that would make it harder for Iran to release them. more
By The Financial Times

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 13:3:41 GMT
High Alert at US and UK Bases
Our military sources report that Middle East and Persian Gulf nations as well as the US and UK are bracing for further Iranian marine, air or terrorist operations in Iraq and other places in reprisal for the sanctions measure before the UN Security Council in New York. On the ready too are the Saudi armed forces and some Israeli air and naval units. more
By DEBKAfile

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 12:52:26 GMT
Oil-rich Iran May Have to Ration Petrol
Iranians last week celebrated the start of their new year, but alongside the festive goldfish and fireworks displays, 1386 might bring a rise in their petrol bills. After two years of dithering, the government is at last ready to introduce rationing and a price hike to reduce a subsidy that costs the country billions of dollars a year. more
By The Economist

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 11:17:5 GMT
Iran Raises the Hostage Stakes
The 15 British sailors and Royal Marines captured by Iranian Revolutionary Guards in a waterway separating Iran and Iraq were yesterday trapped in an outbreak of aggressive political brinkmanship that may mark a bleak turning point in the West’s relations with Tehran. more
By The Sunday Times

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 11:0:11 GMT
Iran 'To Try Britons For Espionage'
Fifteen British sailors and marines arrested by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards off the coast of Iraq may be charged with spying. A website run by associates of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, reported last night that the Britons would be put before a court and indicted. more
By The Times

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 1:44:20 GMT
Seized Britons Face Prosecution After Tehran Claims 'Confession'
Iran defiantly rebuffed international demands yesterday for the release of 15 seized British naval personnel, claiming that the sailors and Royal Marines had confessed to entering its waters in an illegal act of aggression, and were now to be prosecuted in the Iranian capital. more
By The Observer

Posted 25/3/2007 @ 1:22:5 GMT
Blair Convenes Cobra Team as Crisis in Iran Escalates
The official notification, delivered in secure calls yesterday morning to senior Whitehall figures, was the latest dramatic behind-the-scenes move to get to grips with a crisis that is now engulfing the government. more
By Scotman

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Sunni, Shi'a and the "Trotskyists of Islam"

February 09, 2007 OpenDemocracy Fred Haliday
The conflict now besetting the middle east is, like all major international conflicts, multidimensional. It involves not just one major axis of violence (Israel/Arabs, United States/terrorism, west/Iran) but several overlapping conflicts that draw states and armed movements into their arena. The major concern of strategists and analysts remains the polarisation between the US and its foes in Iraq and, increasingly, in Iran. But there is another important, ominous, conflict accompanying these that has little to do with the machinations of Washington or Israel, and is less likely to be contained by political compromise: the spread, in a way radically new for the middle east, of direct conflict between Sunni and Shi'a Muslims.
Many generalisations and simplifications accompany the whole issue of Sunni and Shi'a Islam. In the aftermath of the Iranian revolution, when Ayatollah Khomeini produced a radical, populist, third-world rhetoric that denounced the west and the "golden idols" or taghut who served imperialist interests in the region (among them the Shah of Iran, Anwar Sadat, Saddam Hussein, and the Gulf rulers), it was claimed by many that Shi'ism, the belief of around 10% of all Muslims, was inherently militant. Unlike the Sunni, who had historically accepted the legitimacy of Islamic rulers, the caliphs, and who paid their clergy from state funds, thereby controlling them, the Shi'a refused to accept the Muslim credentials of their rulers and produced a clergy, paid for by the subscriptions of the faithful, that were closer to the people and so more radical. I recall a conversation with Ibrahim Yazdi, the first foreign minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran (who after Ayatollah Khomeini's death spent years under virtual house arrest in Tehran). As he sat under the enormous chandeliers of what had been the Shah's foreign ministry, he exclaimed with pride: "We are the Trotskyists of Islam!"
Please read the rest of this article here. http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization/islam_4334.jsp

BUT BEFORE YOU DO HERE IS MY COMMENT ABOUT THIS ARTICLE .

I am sorry that you have missed the point yet again Mr Fred Haiday - Just like when you fell in love with the likes of Ibrahim Yazdi in 1978 and promoted Khomeini and his like minded lunatics. The modern version of Shaisam with its emphases on the coming of Mehdi is sacrileges to the Sunnis. That's what is the root of the animosity between these two groups. You have failed to mention or grasp the importance of this crucial aspect that divides the Muslims today.