Coalition of the Concerned Grows in Iran HA HA, LOL....

Financial Times reports OF A COMEDY SCENE from Tehran that there are some very YELLOWISH STAINED PANTS walking about there.

Here is How FT describes it with some help from me!

A new political coalition is emerging in Iran in response to growing US pressure, especially over Tehran's nuclear programme, and in concern over the radical approach of President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad in both foreign and domestic policy. It stretches from reformists and even secular intellectuals to fundamentalists, and results from a belief that Iran may be facing the most serious challenge of its modern history.

Behzad Nabavi, a leading reformist (Piss Artist) has said that, new informal re groupings are being (groomed ) formed based on concern . . .  over the fate of the country and the regime, and a common sense of danger is overcoming the differences over democracy and cultural issues.

Bullocks. WHAT THEY ARE REALLY SAYING IS TO LETS PUT AWAY THE DIFFERENCES OVER DEMOCRACY AND CULTURAL/RELIGIOUS ISSUES AND SAVE THE REGIME.)

Although it remains unclear what direct impact this so-called coalition of the concerned can have on nuclear policy or Iran’s relationship with Iraq, for instance, its aim is to put Tehran's case more clearly internationally and perhaps craft conciliatory measures (CAP IN HAND START TO KISS BUSH`S ASS). It also wants Iran’s supreme leader to rein in Mr Ahmadi-Nejad. (ANTARI-COMMUNIST-NEJAD.)

A regime insider ( MALIJACK ) have said that they ( IRI ) are facing the most serious political challenges domestically and internationally in THEIR history and that the ruling clerics may be forced into compromises that even the Qajar kings [1795-1925] didn't make.” Iranians remember the Qajar period for weakness, stagnation and humiliating concessions to great powers, including ceding territory to Russia and control of fin­ance and oil to the British. (BEING WEAK, THEY WERE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE CLERGY, VERY SIMILAR TO THIS LOT)

The coalition is gathered partly around two former presidents, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, (Rasman Jani with an international warrant for his arrest for complicity to terrorism and murder) a conservative pragmatist, and the reformist Mohammad Khatami (the laughing Don Quito-matador facing more or less the same charges and maybe more).

With the UN resolution and US military build-up it has now down on them the feeling that Washington's aim is not just stopping Iran’s uranium enrichment but overthrowing its regime. Sen­ior figures argue, the national interest cannot tolerate an inexperienced president whose rhetoric is inflammatory. (as though this poor idiot could set any agenda by himself or has the power to decide on anything important). (The BLAME GAME HAS STARTED).

Rasman jani, who has been at the centre of Iranian politics since the 1979 revolution and the CRIMINAL 1980-88 war with Iraq, (and is implicated with all the crimes committed in the last 28 years of IRI), repeatedly gives warning that Iran must be “careful” and not fuel “US adventurism”. Such wariness is apparently shared by Ayatollah Ali Khameni, the supreme leader, who waited two weeks before public comment on the UN resolution.

Mohammad Atrianfar, another (MALIJACK) boot licker has said that, “The regime's strategic policy remains avoiding confrontation because the US has the upper hand, even though Iran is being treated unjustly,”. (that makes me laugh). Some of Iran’s most seasoned politicians and officials are propagating that the US and Israel seek nothing short of the country's break-up. (that old chestnut).

'I backed talks with the US for a long time but sadly I've reached the conclusion they want to cut Iran into pieces,” a diplomat said. (which diplomat? the kind that got nabbed in ARBIL?).They are now putting out the line that 'Iran is a multinational state with a variety of groups who feel discrimination by the majority Persians and Shia Muslims and are accusing Britain and the US of stirring unrest among Kurdish and Arab minorities in the north-west and oil-rich south " [as thought the mullah Mafia's haven`t done enough themselves).

The FT, quotes a senior reformist. (LOL) that, “The leaders of the Islamic revolution managed to maintain Iran’s territorial integrity at critical times, but I'm not sure they can do the same this time if they face the US’s destructive power,” (ha ha ha ).

While some insiders argue that although Mr Ahmadi-Nejad has little role in the nuclear issue, they worry that his rhetoric is taken seriously by the west ( HA HA ) and even welcomed by hard-liners in the US and Israel.

And now parts of the conservative media with KHA manie (ac) blessings have blamed Mr Ahmadi-Nejad for the UN resolution and for disrupting nuclear talks with Europe (THE FALL GUY) and the pragmatists from across the spectrum (the Todeh -Communist) are looking to Ali Larijani, Iran’s top security official, to revive talks with Javier Solana, the European Union foreign policy chief, that stalled last year.

They are encouraged by his response to the UN resolution. Facing reporters’ insistence on Wednesday that he clarify Iran’s position on the nuclear issue, Mr Larijani stressed the importance of a “thoughtful” rather than a “hasty” reaction. (BULLOCKS! ITS TOO LATE).

Criticism of the president have been encouraged by Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s setback in elections last month. The emboldened approach appears designed to create a consensus that leads Kha menei (ac) to rein in – or even remove – the president. (GOOD RIDDANCE)

“The leader is still quiet about election results, (HE IS SICK AND ON MORPHINE) probably trying to analyse them, but he doesn't seem happy with Mr Ahmadi-Nejad any more,” said one insider (MALIJACK). “Mr Ahmadi-Nejad consults the leader less than any previous president but, if one day he ignores the leader's orders, he'll be finished within a week through impeachment by parliament.” (as though it has been any different at any other time).

Parliament is in uproar, ( the same parliament that was stuffed with %90 Basiji's and pasdars) accusing the government of gross mismanagement as prices and unemployment rise. But such a dramatic move as impeachment – unknown in the Islamic Republic's 28 years – would need Kha menei (ac)’s backing to succeed. ( he appoints them and he sacks them ) “Kha menei (ac) still doesn't believe the president should go,” said a former Iranian diplomat. ( NOT YET ANYWAY ) “And if the international crisis becomes more serious, the leader would not allow an impeachment that would make Iran look weak domestically.” ( SHUT THE BARN DOOR, THE HORSES HAVE BOLTED! YOU IDIOT).