Let me start by saying that I am a dedicated opposer of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Idiots) and I have been for the last 30 years.
In this article, http://tinyurl.com/3duwwv , the author speaks of the ills of this diabolic system ( IRI) and the way The British have instigated this murderous and bloody system and have supported it for the last 30 years. I fully agree with him and more... But he is using all these right arguments to force through a wrong premise - that of the terrorist organisation of PEOPLES MUJAHEDDIN OF KHALGH - and its so called Parliament in exile - in IRAQ and Paris.- the same places where Khomeini and his gang sprang up!
The old fool that I am referring to is Mr. (Lord) Waddington .
He was the home secretary under Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government. The same gang who arranged for the Guadeloupe conference after the near bankruptcy of United Kingdom due to the Oil and Terrorist policies of the time instigated in the Middle East and voted to disband the 2500 year old system of government in Iran and replace it with a newly made up system by a bunch of fascist mullahs (The Velayat a Fagheh - The Islamic Republic of Idiots). Now he is moaning and groaning again and wants to replace this bunch of lying fascist terrorists with another lot of lying fascist- this time - left wing terrorist cult.
No, you old fool. Your schemes will not bear any more fruits. The days when the British could set the agenda for the world to follow have long gone. NOBODY WILL EVER AGAIN LISTEN TO YOUR BLOODY ADVICE - IF THEY HAVE AN IOTA OF USEFUL BRAIN CELLS LEFT IN THEIR THICK HEADS!
Removing the PMOI from the list of proscribed organisations WILL not happen and even if it did WILL not be supported by the majority of freedom seeking Iranians as they know this cult much better then you and will not be fooled again by your agendas and agents.
YOU SAY:
1 : The British government should engage in dialogue with the Iranian resistance, recognising the right of the Iranian people to self-determination and to democratic change in their country.
2 : It should work towards the adoption of a firm policy towards the Iranian regime through resolutions at the UN Security Council over the regime's human rights abuses, support for terrorism, interference in Iraq/Afghanistan and pursuit of nuclear weapons.
3 : The government would certainly do well to work with other EU states to list the Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist entity and impose comprehensive arms, trade, oil and technology sanctions against the regime.
BUT HOW ARE THEY TO ACHIEVE THIS POLICY? BY SUPPORTING ONE TERRORIST ORGANISATION AND REPLACING THEM WITH ANOTHER TERRORIST ORGANISATION?
This judgement is a NOT a victory for the rule of law in your (democratic society -DO NOT MAKE ME LOUGH) country and for those who hope and strive for democracy in Iran. A case brought up to the law benches by the power and the money of LORDS & LADIES like you is not a sign of a decision made by the society of Democrats living in a FREE society. Pull the other one LORD this and that. go ask the people who vote for their elected representatives into offices- and who despise you and your upper class pretensions - not the titled son of a bitches around you. I suppose that now that you have persuade your friends, the law LORDS to support your motion you can say: - It is a moral imperative to remove all "unlawful" obstructions on the opposition to PMOI, so it can freely engage with the international community and organise legitimate resistance to the dictatorship ruling Iran and threatening the world today. But what you forget to point out is that this cult are NOT a Legitimate Resistant Movement against the Mullahs. THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN NOR THEY WILL EVER BECOME ONE. THEY ARE OF THE SAME BUNCH ALTHOUGH FROM DIFFERENT STRANDS OF THE SAME STINKING STRING.
The PMOI and the resistance's (SO CALLED) parliament-in-exile ( THAT HAS NEVER HAD AN OPEN MEMBERSHIP OR HAS ALLOWED ANYONE FREELY STAND FOR ANY OF SO CALLED ELECTIONS FOR THEIR VARIOUS POSTS AND ARE A CLOSED MARXIST CONTROLLED CABAL), NCRI, PRETEND to have demonstrated their commitment to democratic values - (they were set up as a Terrorist organisation by the KGB in 1973/4 when the Russians found out that the late Shah had cancer and planned their long term strategies against Iran)- and have been toiling at the same policies for the past 35 years. It is not the first time that they say they have renounced violence and terrorist activities. They are still at it but this time covertly in the guise of the left wing workers parties and leftist student groupings deceiving another generation of young Iranians and making them cheap fodder for the infamous mad dogs of the Islamic Fascist's security henchmen. The great sympathy and support for the human rights in Iran, is not due to PMOI- MKO's role in engaging difficult issues in Iraq and the region (spying and insurgency work for the British, US and Israelis), and they certainly DO NOT HAVE ANY plans for a secular, democratic Iran. What they are after is a Marxist-Islamic left wing system like Hugo Chavez's and they have their eye on Iran's oil wealth. that's all! they are spies and terrorist and they will never change.
Why don't you be a good boy - and a good citizen-and think through these silly idea's of yours? or better still in this season of good will - just shut up - and keep drinking your whisky instead!
IMPERIAL EMBLEM
PERSIA
Iranian Freedom Fighters UNITE
Showing posts with label mojahedin e khalgh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mojahedin e khalgh. Show all posts
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Iraq Intensifies Efforts to Expel Iranian GroupThough
Labeled Terrorist, MEK Has Updated U.S. on Tehran's Nuclear Program
By Ernesto Londoño and Saad al-IzziWashington Post Staff WritersWednesday, March 14, 2007; A10
BAGHDAD -- For three years, thousands of members of a militant group dedicated to overthrowing Iran's theocracy have lived in a sprawling compound north of Baghdad under the protection of the U.S. military. American soldiers chauffeur top leaders of the group, known as the Mujaheddin-e Khalq, or MEK, to and from their compound, where they have hosted dozens of visitors in an energetic campaign to persuade the State Department to stop designating the group as a terrorist organization. Now the Iraqi government is intensifying its efforts to evict the 3,800 or so members of the group who live in Iraq, although U.S. officials say they are in no hurry to change their policy toward the MEK, which has been a prime source of information about Iran's nuclear program. The Iraqi government announced this week that roughly 100 members would face prosecution for human rights violations, a move MEK officials contend comes at the request of the Iranian government. "We have documents, witnesses," Jaafar al-Moussawi, a top Iraqi prosecutor, said Monday, alleging that the MEK aided President Saddam Hussein's campaign to crush Shiite and Kurdish opposition movements at the end of the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Moussawi said the criminal complaint would implicate MEK members in "killing, torture, [wrongful] imprisonment and displacement." The group denied involvement in Hussein's reprisals. "These allegations are preposterous and lies made by the Iranian mullahs and repeated by their agents," it said in a statement issued this week. The case highlights the occasional discord between the U.S. and Iraqi governments on matters related to Iran. While the U.S. government has accused Iran of supplying Iraqi Shiite militias with sophisticated weapons that it says have been used to kill American troops, Iraq's Shiite-led government has expanded commercial and diplomatic ties with its majority-Shiite neighbor. "This organization has always destabilized the security situation" in Iraq, said Mariam Rayis, a top foreign affairs adviser to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, adding that the MEK's continued presence "could lead to deteriorating the relationship with neighboring countries." MEK leaders dispute the prosecutor's allegations. They contend that Iran has infiltrated Iraq's political leadership while also supporting militant groups in an effort to keep the United States in a quagmire in Iraq. They also say the Iranian government wants to forestall a U.S. attack on Iran. "The Iranian regime wants very much to prevent the winds of change," Behzad Saffari, a spokesman for the group, said in a recent interview at a Baghdad hotel. "Instead of fighting the Americans in Iran, [the Iranian government] is fighting them in Iraq. If we have to leave Iraq, it means the Americans are defeated. It means Iran has prevailed." Maliki told officials from neighboring countries during a meeting in Baghdad on Saturday that Iraq should not become a battleground where other nations attempt to settle their disputes. The Iranian Embassy in Baghdad did not reply to questions about the MEK. The MEK, also known as the People's Mujaheddin of Iran, was founded by students at Tehran University in 1965 as an opposition movement to Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the country's U.S.-backed dictator. The group clashed with that government and later with the Islamic Republic established by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979. In 1986, the MEK moved its headquarters to Iraq, where Hussein welcomed the organization. MEK fighters have been widely accused of backing Hussein's suppression of the Shiite and Kurdish uprisings, but MEK officials say Kurdish leaders have absolved them of playing a role in the crackdown on Kurds. In 1997, during a period of warmer relations between Washington and Tehran under the Clinton administration, the State Department added the MEK to its list of foreign terrorist organizations. The group's leader, Maryam Rajavi, lives in Paris. She has a cultlike following among members, some of whom set themselves on fire to protest her brief arrest in 2003 after French officials raided the group's offices. Rajavi has led efforts to have the group's terror label removed in the United States and Europe. In December, a European court overturned an E.U. order freezing the group's assets. The European Union has not removed the group from its terrorist list. The MEK says it has several thousand members in Iran, but the extent of its support base is unclear. Most exiled members live in the camp at Ashraf, north of Baghdad. After Hussein was toppled, the MEK agreed to turn over its weapons to U.S. military officials. In 2004, the U.S. military granted its members the status of "protected persons" under the Geneva Conventions and has since provided security for the camp. Shortly after the camp was set up, FBI and State Department officials screened residents and found no evidence that would lead them to charge anyone with a crime. A Washington Post special correspondent toured Camp Ashraf in January. It is a largely self-sufficient compound, and the majority of members haven't left in years. It has shops, a swimming pool, an ice cream store, a bakery and a soda factory that makes a cola- and orange-flavored drink locals call Ashraf Cola.
Last summer, Maliki gave the group six months to leave Iraq. Although the deadline has elapsed, Iraqi officials say they intend to expel the group after getting parliamentary approval.
MEK officers argue that their expulsion would be a violation of international law and have obtained a legal opinion to that effect from the U.N. refugee agency. They say they should be treated as refugees, not terrorists. Lou Fintor, the spokesman at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, said there has been no change in the government's position toward the MEK. A U.S. military spokesman in Iraq did not respond to questions about the MEK. A senior U.S. military official who spoke on condition of anonymity said protecting the MEK was "not a big drain on our resources," adding, "This is a political problem between Iraq, Iran and the MEK." If the group is expelled, it is unclear where Ashraf residents would go or what other country might take them. MEK leaders refuse to speak about such a scenario, reiterating that their expulsion would be illegal. The leaders say they are a main source of intelligence on Iran and question why the United States keeps the group on its terrorist list. "All the important things that are talked about are things revealed by us," said Mohammad Mohaddessin chairman of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, the MEK's political arm, referring to information about Iran's nuclear ambitions and, more recently, the roadside bombs the United States says Iran has made available to insurgents in Iraq. Moussawi, the Iraqi prosecutor, said the human rights case is not politically motivated. The issue of expulsion, which is not directly related to the pending criminal charges, is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament in coming weeks. Some lawmakers have criticized Maliki for making the issue a priority at a time when Iraq is besieged by more serious problems. "If you take it from a humanitarian side, I don't think they should leave until the situation can be resolved," Saleh al-Mutlak, a Sunni lawmaker, said in an interview. "It is surprising that the government of Iraq is giving such an order. This will only show that the Maliki government will obey Iran's orders."
By Ernesto Londoño and Saad al-IzziWashington Post Staff WritersWednesday, March 14, 2007; A10
BAGHDAD -- For three years, thousands of members of a militant group dedicated to overthrowing Iran's theocracy have lived in a sprawling compound north of Baghdad under the protection of the U.S. military. American soldiers chauffeur top leaders of the group, known as the Mujaheddin-e Khalq, or MEK, to and from their compound, where they have hosted dozens of visitors in an energetic campaign to persuade the State Department to stop designating the group as a terrorist organization. Now the Iraqi government is intensifying its efforts to evict the 3,800 or so members of the group who live in Iraq, although U.S. officials say they are in no hurry to change their policy toward the MEK, which has been a prime source of information about Iran's nuclear program. The Iraqi government announced this week that roughly 100 members would face prosecution for human rights violations, a move MEK officials contend comes at the request of the Iranian government. "We have documents, witnesses," Jaafar al-Moussawi, a top Iraqi prosecutor, said Monday, alleging that the MEK aided President Saddam Hussein's campaign to crush Shiite and Kurdish opposition movements at the end of the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Moussawi said the criminal complaint would implicate MEK members in "killing, torture, [wrongful] imprisonment and displacement." The group denied involvement in Hussein's reprisals. "These allegations are preposterous and lies made by the Iranian mullahs and repeated by their agents," it said in a statement issued this week. The case highlights the occasional discord between the U.S. and Iraqi governments on matters related to Iran. While the U.S. government has accused Iran of supplying Iraqi Shiite militias with sophisticated weapons that it says have been used to kill American troops, Iraq's Shiite-led government has expanded commercial and diplomatic ties with its majority-Shiite neighbor. "This organization has always destabilized the security situation" in Iraq, said Mariam Rayis, a top foreign affairs adviser to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, adding that the MEK's continued presence "could lead to deteriorating the relationship with neighboring countries." MEK leaders dispute the prosecutor's allegations. They contend that Iran has infiltrated Iraq's political leadership while also supporting militant groups in an effort to keep the United States in a quagmire in Iraq. They also say the Iranian government wants to forestall a U.S. attack on Iran. "The Iranian regime wants very much to prevent the winds of change," Behzad Saffari, a spokesman for the group, said in a recent interview at a Baghdad hotel. "Instead of fighting the Americans in Iran, [the Iranian government] is fighting them in Iraq. If we have to leave Iraq, it means the Americans are defeated. It means Iran has prevailed." Maliki told officials from neighboring countries during a meeting in Baghdad on Saturday that Iraq should not become a battleground where other nations attempt to settle their disputes. The Iranian Embassy in Baghdad did not reply to questions about the MEK. The MEK, also known as the People's Mujaheddin of Iran, was founded by students at Tehran University in 1965 as an opposition movement to Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the country's U.S.-backed dictator. The group clashed with that government and later with the Islamic Republic established by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979. In 1986, the MEK moved its headquarters to Iraq, where Hussein welcomed the organization. MEK fighters have been widely accused of backing Hussein's suppression of the Shiite and Kurdish uprisings, but MEK officials say Kurdish leaders have absolved them of playing a role in the crackdown on Kurds. In 1997, during a period of warmer relations between Washington and Tehran under the Clinton administration, the State Department added the MEK to its list of foreign terrorist organizations. The group's leader, Maryam Rajavi, lives in Paris. She has a cultlike following among members, some of whom set themselves on fire to protest her brief arrest in 2003 after French officials raided the group's offices. Rajavi has led efforts to have the group's terror label removed in the United States and Europe. In December, a European court overturned an E.U. order freezing the group's assets. The European Union has not removed the group from its terrorist list. The MEK says it has several thousand members in Iran, but the extent of its support base is unclear. Most exiled members live in the camp at Ashraf, north of Baghdad. After Hussein was toppled, the MEK agreed to turn over its weapons to U.S. military officials. In 2004, the U.S. military granted its members the status of "protected persons" under the Geneva Conventions and has since provided security for the camp. Shortly after the camp was set up, FBI and State Department officials screened residents and found no evidence that would lead them to charge anyone with a crime. A Washington Post special correspondent toured Camp Ashraf in January. It is a largely self-sufficient compound, and the majority of members haven't left in years. It has shops, a swimming pool, an ice cream store, a bakery and a soda factory that makes a cola- and orange-flavored drink locals call Ashraf Cola.
Last summer, Maliki gave the group six months to leave Iraq. Although the deadline has elapsed, Iraqi officials say they intend to expel the group after getting parliamentary approval.
MEK officers argue that their expulsion would be a violation of international law and have obtained a legal opinion to that effect from the U.N. refugee agency. They say they should be treated as refugees, not terrorists. Lou Fintor, the spokesman at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, said there has been no change in the government's position toward the MEK. A U.S. military spokesman in Iraq did not respond to questions about the MEK. A senior U.S. military official who spoke on condition of anonymity said protecting the MEK was "not a big drain on our resources," adding, "This is a political problem between Iraq, Iran and the MEK." If the group is expelled, it is unclear where Ashraf residents would go or what other country might take them. MEK leaders refuse to speak about such a scenario, reiterating that their expulsion would be illegal. The leaders say they are a main source of intelligence on Iran and question why the United States keeps the group on its terrorist list. "All the important things that are talked about are things revealed by us," said Mohammad Mohaddessin chairman of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, the MEK's political arm, referring to information about Iran's nuclear ambitions and, more recently, the roadside bombs the United States says Iran has made available to insurgents in Iraq. Moussawi, the Iraqi prosecutor, said the human rights case is not politically motivated. The issue of expulsion, which is not directly related to the pending criminal charges, is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament in coming weeks. Some lawmakers have criticized Maliki for making the issue a priority at a time when Iraq is besieged by more serious problems. "If you take it from a humanitarian side, I don't think they should leave until the situation can be resolved," Saleh al-Mutlak, a Sunni lawmaker, said in an interview. "It is surprising that the government of Iraq is giving such an order. This will only show that the Maliki government will obey Iran's orders."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
اخبار مربوط به زندانیان سیاسی و نقض حقوق بشر
Tulips in Holland
